I often have people ask me why I’m not a fan of Apple. I thought I’d try to gather my thoughts into something with a bit of organization. I had hoped it would be short, but it turned into a long rant. It’s also pretty coarse. Here we go:<\/p>\n
Simple as that. Not enough? Let\u2019s go through some examples, starting with this one: First, let\u2019s tackle the mobile.<\/p>\n Johnathon Zittrain outlined this issue in 2008<\/a>. If you buy an Apple phone you have to get\/buy applications and music for it from iTunes. They limit what apps can be created and sold, and limit which devices they can be used on (own more than 5 devices in your lifetime? Tough luck, buy all your stuff again). If you buy a new Android phone later you have to then get\/buy an entirely new set of applications for that phone. This means people who buy apple are locked into using Apple, because switching out of it costs you a lot of time and money. The same goes for Android, but at least it\u2019s supported by all carriers and has many more phone manufacturers. iPhones are not modular. You can\u2019t upgrade memory or [easily] switch in a new battery (unless you pay them mad $$$$ or void your warranty). The USB\/power adapter for an iPhone only works for iPhones. You are unable to use an iPhone as a mobile hard drive. Historically Apple has asserted control over iPhones that eliminate choices. They used to be an AT&T-only device, and now only have a few carriers. They used to not allow multitasking on phones, like if you wanted to listen to music, surf the web and deal with text pop-ups at the same time. And they still do not support Flash, blocking users out of a major form of web content. iTunes infests every file you download with digital rights management (DRM) that makes it only usable in certain conditions. The traits make it easy to argue that information could be a public good (non-exclusive, non-rivalrous, with low marginal cost and likelihood of positive externality). Apple wants to be the one who controls all replication, search and persistence.<\/p>\n Apple wants everyone to use Apple, so that the value of their product is higher.<\/p>\n Apple doesn\u2019t want to promote creation (unless it is on their terms, on their devices and within their constraints) and definitely wants to control the spread of information. It is trying to counter the social norms and economic possibilities of information. Now, let\u2019s talk about Mac computers.<\/p>\n Are you one of us?<\/i> Not only does Apple find a way to charge you for everything because it\u2019s all proprietary, but their computers cost a lot in the first place. Tremendously so – two to three times more expensive! Apple controls their hardware in many ways. They don\u2019t want you to know the model number for your computer, so that they can prevent you from upgrading it on your own. This way you must take it into their store and pay them to do it. In fact even under \u201cabout this Mac\u201d you won\u2019t find model numbers, but instead a vague \u201cearly\/mid\/late 20xx.\u201d They also like proprietary plugs. VGA adapter type has changed with virtually every generation of Mac, and this, combined with obscured model numbers, makes it very difficult to figure out how to buy the right one. Apple power adapters also only fit Apple computers. They are better (the magnetic thing is neato!) but this means you can\u2019t easily borrow one from a friend unless they have a mac. And finally, it\u2019s harder to swap in modular parts even if you do want to do it on your own. Many hard drives and videocards require special firmware for Mac. While historically Macs have been a safe zone from viruses, I am confident this will change in the future. They aren\u2019t as tempting as large corporate bot networks based (on windows) that can be used for spam and DOS attacks and the like, but they do have three factors going for them that could easily make them the up and coming go-to target:<\/p>\n Yes, I am insinuating that many (nMac users are \u201crich people who are bad at computers\u201d and this will make them targets for viruses with clever social engineering. This will likely spread to iOS as well. Clearly people get used to certain operating systems. They get annoyed switching because there are slight differences between them. Sometimes those differences do matter in a substantive way. For instance Expos\u00e9 is really handy for managing many windows on a single screen, and is native only to OSX. By contrast the ability to truly get a full screen view of pictures in a folder and adjust them to be any preview size you like is only available in Windows 7 and Linux. I don\u2019t honestly think these are big issues. Apple, like Microsoft, has made mistakes in charging their interaction models that defy previous norms (OSX Lion switching the scroll direction), but this isn’t all that big of a deal. The biggest complaint have I have about the OS is more of a complaint about people being disorganized but it’s worth noting because there’s a dimension of abstraction and learning. Turns out yes. I often have people ask me why I’m not a fan of Apple. I thought I’d try to gather my thoughts into something with a bit of organization. I had hoped it would be short, but it turned into a long rant. It’s also pretty coarse. Here we go: Practical: They want to control as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[27,32,131,184,196,226,262,290],"class_list":["post-1279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jag-wire","tag-apple","tag-argument","tag-evil","tag-information-as-commidity","tag-iphone","tag-macbook","tag-opinion","tag-proprietary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jeffginger.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nhttp:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2010\/04\/28\/jon-stewart-rips-into-apple-over-lost-iphone-debacle-thats-going-to-leave-a-mark\/
\n<\/a>
\nThis post is a little harsher and has a more aggressive tone to it. Just envision me on a soap box and take it for its points of interest, not religious doctrine.<\/p>\nThe iPhone trap and the new iPad threat<\/h2>\n
The App Lock<\/h3>\n
\niPads are essentially big iPhones. People are starting to use them instead of laptops. They inherit all of the constraints of the iPhone, which means they are primarily sites of information consumption (not creation), and this consumption happens only on Apple\u2019s terms. If they become as pervasive as laptops we will have a very large body of users who will be at a disadvantage. The social norms of computing will begin to change for the worse. Instead of buying and using software however, whenever and wherever you want, you will have to use it however, whenever and wherever Apple wants. They will find ways to make you pay money for various kinds of use, and you won\u2019t have a choice to use something else, unless you want to pay a lot of money.
\nAlternative:<\/b> Run an OS like Windows 8 (not available yet, but I\u2019m investing all my hope in it) that will run on all hardware platforms (phones, tablets, game consoles, computers) and run any software built by 3rd<\/sup> party developers. Just like a real computer. On more powerful devices (computers, tablets like iPads) you will probably even be able to run a virtual machine to run Apple software!<\/i>
\nAnother Alternative:<\/strong> Jailbreak your iPhone. Install whatever you want. <\/i>Sell it unlocked years later for more than you got it for.
\n<\/i>
\nYet Another Alternative: It seems that Apple’s high-price and unreasonable restrictions are causing it to start to lose the tablet battle, as the Nook and Kindle push their way in. While they still lock you into media library collections, these devices can have Linux installed on them…
\n<\/i><\/p>\nThe Hardware Debacle<\/h3>\n
\nAlternative:<\/b> Apple could make it easy to switch out the battery, use micro-SD or common memory types that can be used in many devices, and make the USB connector something universal, like mini or micro-USB. Allow for users to partition up to 80% of the storage space to be usable as a mobile hard drive.<\/p>\nRedefining Information<\/h3>\n
\nWhy does this bother me? Well, let\u2019s think a minute about the market, economics, and information. On the one hand we\u2019re seeing Apple prevent healthy competition. On the other hand we\u2019re seeing them impose artificial limits on information to make it a much more easily controlled commodity, one that they can have exclusive access to. What are the economic qualities of information? Presented in three relevant sets:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\nAlternative: <\/b>I\u2019m not asking for a completely socialist system, or a purely open market. I\u2019m asking for Apple to not be a jerk. Let me buy a song or app and use it on any device I own. I should be able to make an audio recording on my phone and transfer it to my computer without buying some expensive app to do it. Apple should support common standards like Flash, but allow for new competition, like running other OS\u2019s on iPhones or running iOS on non-Apple hardware. Interoperability and negotiated standards are what benefit consumers the most!<\/p>\nThe MacBook Monster<\/h2>\n
Mac People<\/h3>\n
\nThere are extremists out there when it comes to any kind of opinion or position related to something. I\u2019ve certainly met \u201cLinux people\u201d who wonder why you would ever use a graphical user interface (aka colors, shapes, buttons, desktop, icons, pictures, etc\u2026). There is no single character to \u201cApple\u201d people, exactly, though I think that Apple\u2019s marketing would indicate one. I\u2019ve only played around with a little bit of content analysis of Apple ads, but they\u2019re usually white and well-off, which is really no surprise or difference from most IT advertisement. What I\u2019ve actually gotten more of in person from \u201cApple users\u201d is condescension. It\u2019s the \u201cwe\u2019re better-than-you\u201d club because we know to buy macs because they\u2019re better. Why? “Because they\u2019re pretty. And not PC\u2019s. DUH, gawd, get with the times you narc-bum.” In America we get wrapped up in this tangled mess of consuming as a way to augment, project or otherwise construct your personality and identity. I can\u2019t tell you how many times I\u2019ve heard people say \u201cbut graphic designers use macs because they\u2019re better for that.\u201d Graphic designers are using the same programs<\/i> (e.g. Adobe) on Mac or PC, and actually I\u2019m convinced dual-display is better than a single iMac display any day. The real reason graphic designers use Macs is because other designers do and they learn on them, not because they\u2019re better in any substantively measurable way for design. I also occasionally get the \u201cI use Macs because I\u2019m different\u201d response. This feels a lot like when 500 sorority girls walk down the street all wearing the same T-shirt that says \u201cBe Greek, be Unique.\u201d Apple is incredibly normative, if you want to be truly different run Linux.
\nMac fans sometimes carry the vestiges of the \u201cThank god I switched away from Windows XP\u201d with them. Yes, Windows XP is a bad operating system, and no this is not news. It\u2019s a decade old and, by comparison, now terrible. I wish Vista weren\u2019t a disaster, I\u2019m not going to defend it. But this doesn\u2019t make you wiser for choosing Apple, not in 2011, when we have Windows 7 and are on the cusp of launching Windows 8. Ubuntu and Chromebooks have caught up as a viable options for any user who’s not producing media, playing games or doing power computing.
\nI don’t have an alternative for this one, really, it’s more just what I’ve observed Apple users to be like in-person, anecdotally. I just don’t want to be one of those “better than you” people, I want to bring as many people into computing and the internet as possible, and empower them along the way<\/a>. I don’t want them to have to pay more money to be part of it, and I want them to be able to express themselves to the world on their own terms, not Apple’s.<\/p>\nOutrageous Cost Does NOT mean Quality<\/h3>\n
\nAnd no, this doesn\u2019t mean their hardware is any better. I can buy a computer that\u2019s nearly two times as fast as a mac for what someone would pay for even an entry-level mac. And no, Mac computers don\u2019t have the best graphics. In fact now that they\u2019re stocking the new Sandy Bridge chips their low-end models have Intel Express graphics, which are pretty poor “onboard” chips. AMD processors, while they might be slower overall, offer better integrated graphics. Apple also didn’t get SSD’s with TRIM support until Lion, placing them way behind in the storage race. Their ‘solid unibody construction’ is certainly no more durable than the equally-priced Lenovo (previously IBM) business travel Thinkpads or the military-grade Panasonic Toughbooks. Many people say Apple products are tougher and last longer, but I’m pretty convinced these days they have the same degree of planned obsolescence as everyone else – they want you to upgrade every two years and sign a new contract of some kind.
\nIn other words Macs don’t have the fastest or highest quality hardware, and are often not at the cutting-edge of speed and technological development. They’re certainly not budget-buy machines, but they’re not the best either. They’re just priced high.<\/p>\nApple Hardware Compatibility<\/h3>\n
\nAlternative: Apple, get with the program. Just make your hardware flexible, labeled and modular like everyone else. It’s not good to be different if different is incompatible or unnecessarily more costly. Oh, and can you release your OS for install on any computer hardware? That would be handy. And… like… Windows and Linux??<\/p>\nVirus? Coming soon to a Mac near you<\/h3>\n
\n
\nAlternative: Uh, well, anti-virus for Mac is going to become more common…<\/p>\nThe OS \u2013 Real Problems?<\/h3>\n
\nThe File System Display:<\/b> Apple obscures the hierarchical relation of folders and files. In Windows you have a C-drive, subfolders and so on, and you could easily illustrate this structure as a tree. Mac has this too, but if you have a folder open in Finder you will just see yourself in a place like \u201cdocuments\u201d or \u201cpictures\u201d or \u201capplications\u201d. I find this causes users to do silly things, like downloading and unpacking an archive for a program into applications, installing it in applications, and leaving the install files there floating, to create a bloated mess. Besides this, what happens is users lose track of sorting files in an organized fashion. They learn to just use spotlight to find things they want and kind of just put stuff wherever, without having a good model in their head for knowing where it is. Don\u2019t get me wrong \u2013 this happens on PC\u2019s all of the time too \u2013 especially with Windows 7\u2019s new \u201clibraries\u201d system or just dumping files on the desktop, but I think OSX encourages the behavior by always hiding the true location you\u2019re in (the path or address bar) and abandoning the file address metaphor. I don\u2019t think relational search and organization is bad, I just want to train users how to do both hierarchical and relational. I’ve met a lot of people (remember 5 years as a netech and several years as a technology education person, I\u2019ve met hundreds of computers and their users) that can\u2019t keep their files straight. They\u2019ll have 10 gb videos laying around from 2 years ago in some strange directory that they\u2019ve forgotten about. A gagillion programs installed that they don\u2019t use. It\u2019s sad and frustrating, and I think Windows does an ever-so-slightly better job of helping people to have an idea about how a computer is organized beneath the GUI.
\nAlternative:<\/b> Include a file path in the top of finder windows, one that can be turned off via view options. Include the true path and extension of a file in the properties for the file. Really the better solution to this is to teach people to be more capable of effectively organizing information, something I’d argue is a part of digital literacy education.<\/p>\nDoes Apple do anything well besides make money and control people?<\/h3>\n
\niMovie.<\/b>
\nThe only low-cost easy-to-use video editing program that lets you map music to media via timeline, includes a hefty sum of excellent templates\/effects and helps you to manage your assets with other integrated sound and photo editing programs. Check it out<\/a> if you haven’t already. I even figured out how to do OSx86 and run OSX 10.6.8 on a Virtualbox install to try to get it\u2026 but sadly you need a true mac with video acceleration to run it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"