While I think I’d prefer not to write political posts on the blog for a variety of reasons, this year the Republican National Convention has come to my home, the Twin Cities…and I can’t resist posting my favorite of the billboards that has been put up in honor of the event:
Bugs are scary
These days digital cameras can take pictures with downright breathtaking quality of color and detail. A sweet deal… but then someone had to go and take pictures of bugs close up and holy crap these guys are freaky looking! It’s actually pretty remarkable how intricate the features of a tiny little insect are, when you get right down to it. Anyway if you have a moment or two, find your nearest enemy and put one of these up as their desktop background:
More from Dalantech.
If you also happen to own a 5000$ camera you might try taking some pictures of bugs yourself, this guy gives some tutorials. He managed to get some of his pictures into National Geographic!
Becoming a Master of Arts
I know my professional blog has been quiet for a couple of months now – I spent much of the summer working on my porfolio and reading. I’ve suddenly been thrusted head over heels into my second year of graduate school. I’m teaching two new classes – an introduction to Sociology (soc 100) and Social Perspectives on the Family (soc 273) – but these feel like a natural part of life now, while I’m still in love with teaching I have plenty of confidence I can do it well. No, what scares me more is this whole independent study Masters paper thing. Most of the normal Sociology PhD’s here just write a paper that counts for their masters somewhere along their track to the higher degree but because of my transfer I need to finish it ASAP to begin my work in LIS. So I lined up an independent study and flushed out an outline to finish one paper, start two others, read oodles of sources, collect interview and focus group data, contact everyone around campus who has anything to do with what I do, and otherwise lose my mind. It’s terrifying.
At this point I have no idea if I’ve bit off more than I can chew. Being busy out of my mind is a normal state of affairs for me but this time the pressure is ten fold as high because I’m doing something I’m not so sure about and am very new to. I still don’t even know who all of my readers are because there are a whole two people directly related to what I do in Sociology.
In many ways I’m excited and enthusiastic – I have faith in my own abilities and motivation and have no fears about my interest in the subject. I know plenty of people who could help me out and have a plethora of resources among students and programs in the University. But at the end of the semester I’m going to be handing a paper to three individuals who’ve been trained for years in academe to be intensely critical and who have only a few minor connections to my area of study. It’s already a battle explaining to older professors the relevance of Facebook, it’s going to be an even bigger battle explaining it to professors who aren’t interested in technology.
But that’s okay. This is what I signed on for when I chose to go to grad school, and dealing with criticism, like it or not, is essential in an academe infiltrated by argument disguised as dialectic. I’m here to learn, I’m as smart and capable as I am, and only know what my experiences have taught me. Here goes nothing…
Elephant Stories and Psychology: Part 3
Ruby, an Asian elephant primarily associated with the Phoenix zoo, became famous in the late 80’s for her abstract paintings. After her keepers noticed the elephant scratching in the dirt with sticks, they offered her a paintbrush, and Ruby the (very profitable) Painting Elephant was born. Art collectors from all over the world joined what became 18-month waiting lists for a painting from the elephant. An individual painting sold for up to $5,000.
According to her “CNN obituary”:http://www.cnn.com/US/9811/06/dead.elephant/, Ruby’s paintings raised about $500,000 for the zoo. She died in 1998 at 25 years of age and at 9,000 lbs. during complications from an attempted c-section.
Elephant paintings have since become something of a fad, and there are multiple other endeavors to sell paintings done by the animals; “this NOVICA article”:http://www.novica.com/news/index.cfm?articleid=51 details just a few. Multiple kinds of animal art has been sold in auctions such as Christie’s. A team of two Moscow-born entrepreneurs, Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid, have even organized elephant painting-only auctions; they “began with dog art,” have exhibited photographs taken by a chimpanzee, and after their elephant project intend to “work with beavers using processed wooden boards on an architectural project” (read more about Komar and Melamid “here”:http://archives.cnn.com/2000/STYLE/arts/03/22/life.art.reut/).
Map Monday: Walkable Neighborhoods
Many of my recent Map Monday tools have been more than just maps, but rather they have been tools that have harnessed mapping functions in order to tell a more complete story. Whether it be “keeping your neighborhood safe”:http://duenos.net/article/459/MapMondayTrackingTroublemakers or “tracking the Olympic medal count”:http://duenos.net/article/470/MapMondayTheOlympics, maps are very useful as a way of understanding or interpreting data. This Map Monday feature is an excellent example of that principle.
“WalkScore.com”:http://walkscore.com/ is a website that rates neighborhoods by how walkable they are, and then serves as a forum/information hub for everything to do with urban walkability. This isn’t anything spectacularly new, but what is new is the way that the site’s rankings–walk scores–are determined. Rather than relying on anecdotal evidence and peer review like “WikiTravel”:http://wikitravel.org/ or other wiki-based sites, WalkScore runs addresses through the Local Google API to find amenities close to that address and then, based on the proximity and variety of the amenities found, rates the location from 1-100. Of course there’s more to it than that, and if the social scientist in you needs to read more, check out “their methodology page”:http://walkscore.com/rankings/ranking-methodology.shtml for more.
http://walkscore.com/rankings/, or just view the "138 Walkers' Paradise neighborhoods":http://walkscore.com/rankings/walkers-paradises.php. Not interested in all this hippie bullshit and kind of feel like jumping in your Navigator and running over some wildlife? Check out the "Why Walk?":http://walkscore.com/walking-matters.shtml page for some reasonable explanations of why walking is right for you, me, and everyone.
Caving out Wikipedia
You know as much as I talk up Wikipedia I had never bothered to become a member until just recently. I had even set up my own wikis before diving in, go figure.
Anywho I recently went on a spelunking trip out to Buckner’s Cave in Indiana and jumped on the web to scout out something on the cave on my phone on the way there in the car. Much to my dismay I discovered only a website from 8 years ago and a tiny piece of a Wikipedia entry. I decided it was time to put my knowledge to use and signed up to write an article.
Anyway for those of you who don’t know Buckner’s Cave is a cave outside of Bloomington, Indiana privately owned and operated by the Richard Blenz Nature Conservancy and is free access, assuming you contact them a week in advance.
The experience was spectacular! Three miles of cave with endless off-shoots and passages ranging from enormous caverns to tight squeezes where you have to push your bag first and wedge your shoulders side-ways. We went in without a real good idea of its layout and features and found it to be quite the adventurous exploration! I had the unpleasant experience of being the leader down a long mud tunnel that progressively shrunk smaller and smaller until it dead-ended and I couldn’t go any further… which meant I had to tell the 8 people behind me to back out army-crawl style backwards. We discovered cavern after passage after cavern, and explored in all sorts of directions and rock environments. On the way back we found ourselves lost (a few times actually) only to be saved by a bat who was in the same spot we left him the first time.
Once out from underground I paged up Wikipedia and wrote my very first official entry, officially wiping out the request for it to be expanded. Huzzah!
Janeites in the 21st Century
I was never a fan of Jane Austen until I took a class that focused on her Aristotelian plot strategies and the core literary merit of her writing. Having converted in a traditional literary sense, then, it’s very difficult for me to take the pop culture Austen that has flooded US chick lit and the media. Nowadays a Janeite can be someone whose other favorite books include Confessions of a Shopaholic. In fact, one of my most recent book store shocks came when I discovered a book titled Confessions of a Jane Austen Addict, detailing the adventures of a woman who is thrown by some sort of time warp into Regency England.
One of the most ridiculous symptoms of this chick lit take on Jane Austen is the recent “makeover” of Austen’s portrait for Wordsworth Editions.
The only uncontested portrait of Jane was drawn by her sister Cassandra in 1810 (Austen was 35) and is on the left side below:
This portrait has been described as “hideously unlike” Jane by Austen’s niece Anna. While it is the only uncontested portrait of Austen (the Rice portrait has always been a great controversy), the sketch does not seem to line up with familial descriptions.
Wordsworth’s version of Jane is the picture to the right of Cassandra’s portrait. Helen Traylor, managing director of the publisher, explains the publisher’s choice:
“The poor old thing didn’t have anything going for her in the way of looks. Her original portrait is very, very dowdy. It wouldn’t be appealing to readers, so I took it upon myself to commission a new picture of her.
“We’ve given her a bit of a makeover, with make-up and some hair extensions and removed her nightcap. Now she looks great — as if she’s just walked out of a salon.”
Nor is Traylor shy about her opinions of other authors’ looks. Since Wordsworth Editions tries to place author portraits on their covers when aesthetics “allow,” Traylor is also evaluating the makeover possibilities for other authors. “Virginia Woolf wasn’t much of a looker,” she says. “I’m also considering making over George Eliot, who was frumpy, and William Wordsworth, who was pretty hideous. Most poets were really unattractive, with the one exception being Tennyson, who has wonderful bone structure.”
Portrait of George Eliot:
Since this is one of the most common portraits of Eliot, I can only imagine that soon she will be remade into a likeness of Catherine Zeta Jones. After all, we wouldn’t want an author looking as though she hadn’t just “walked out of a salon.”
Mud phobic pig
Although I originally intended to write a post for today that had nothing to do with animals, I stumbled on this and couldn’t resist: a pig that supposedly suffers mysophobia, fear of dirt, and has been given Wellies to overcome her issues.
The “BBC Article”:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/north_yorkshire/7448006.stm explains that the piglet was afraid of wallowing in the mud, leading her owners to fit her with Wellies, overcoming the problem. Andrew and Debbie Keeble own a sausage company but no longer plan to slaughter Cinders, the mysophobic piglet.
Map Monday: The Olympics
!http://emersondirect.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/google-olympics.jpg” />
Track the Olympic medal count geo-spatially with Google Maps! I know, I talk too much about Google Maps but seriously, I’ll stop talking about them when they stop innovating. Anyway, check out this cool feature “here at Google Maps Olympics.”:http://maps.google.com/help/maps/2008summergames/
Previously featured on Map Monday:
* “Google Walking Maps”:http://duenos.net/article/462/MapMondayGooglewalkingmaps: Google adds functionality for trip-planning pedestrians. Combine that with GPS and Street View and you’ve got yourself a toolkit.
* “Tracking Troublemakers”:http://duenos.net/textpattern/index.php?event=article&step=edit&ID=459: A local blogger uses online mapping to patrol his own neighborhood.
Doing it Doggy Style
Social Networking, of course. I happened upon DoggySpace.com this morning and thought it was funny but also dangerously dancing the line between cute and obsessive. Visitors can come to the site to create a social networking profile for their pooch. They can then choose to flush out basic information like gender and type but also fill in interactivity and comprehensive identity related items such as “about me.”
As a social scientist this makes me wonder about several things:
- How much are people projecting their own personalities onto their pets? Could it be a foray into identity tourism? Who is the man behind the Rottweiler? Why is this person hitting on my Westie?
- Will the site be a feat in misdirection and an indirect contact medium for people interested in meeting or dating others? I mean that’s largely what dog meet-ups are about, right? Nice dog, wanna frak?
- Do you think some bloke will be fan enough of our parents’ culture of fear to request privacy controls for their pet?
- Which dogs get the most friends? Just the ones who are the most active or do you think it’ll have to do with the cuteness/funny factor too?
- Will LOLcatz language dominate exchanges throughout the site? Or we see the spawn of a new tribute to grammar’s demise?
- Is this place more successful than the cat competition, MyCatSpace.com
- How soon until Facebook and MySpace start acquiring sites like this?
You know I still do believe one of the hallmarks of digital literacy is comfort and familiarity with virtual (digital) individual and group identities, but this is a little strange, even for me. Just wait until my mom puts our dog up on there…