The Geography of Bones



What do you do with a dead body? The American way of death (which happens to be the title of a rather boring book) usually seems to involve burial in a coffin or cremation.

Over in Ghana, some people have become quite creative with their coffins, crafting ones that often reflect the life of the deceased (Were you a pilot? Get buried in a plane! Did you like beer? Why not a beer bottle coffin?) that are creative, artistic, and expensive. National Geographic has an interesting video about the trade in unique coffins.

As for the past…in Victorian England, the fear of being buried alive was so pervasive that dozens of inventors created bell-and-pulley systems for coffins to alert those above ground of a premature burial. People bought caskets with glass partitions that could be smashed by a hammer or pulley system (they didn’t realize that these systems would fail from soil interference).

Before that, Roman children who had lived to forty days and begun teething were called rapti and burned in the case of death, while their Greek infant counterparts were never buried during full night or day but only during Ἡμέρας ἀρπαγίω, the gray dawn just before morning appeared.

Today, you can have yourself or your loved one turned into a postmortem diamond (with the help of LifeGem)…or even, supposedly, a pencil . Alternately, Memorial Spaceflights will release a “symbolic portion” of cremated ashes into “deep space” or take the ashes on a return-trip flight in a commercial or scientific satellite.

Another commonly cited, currently practiced burial tradition is that of sky burial. Tibet supposedly has nearly 1,200 sky burial sites. Although details vary, monks generally prepare bodies (stripping flesh, dipping certain sections in yak butter or flour, crushing bones) for the consumption of vultures and other birds of prey. Zoroastrians practice a similar form of burial at the Towers of Silence, on top of which corpses are placed in rings (men around the outside, women in an inner ring, and children inside that) and bones are collected in an ossuary pit at the center. Water burial, also common to Tibet, involves allowing fish to take care of the body—although due to water contamination this practice has greatly decreased in popularity.
——

On that cheerful note, I’ll introduce myself (since I’m new to the blog). I’m Kristin Ginger. I’m currently a senior English major/Spanish minor at Carleton College in Minnesota and have a wide range of leisure reading interests that will probably surface here from time to time. Not all are as morbid as this one,
fortunately.


I Love Pasta

http://www.ilovepasta.org/index.html, the home of the National Pasta Association. "Cooking tips":http://www.ilovepasta.org/cooking.html, "recipe ideas":http://www.ilovepasta.org/recipes.html, "beautiful drawings of pasta types":http://www.ilovepasta.org/shapes.html (pictured above), there's even a "kid's corner":http://www.ilovepasta.org/funfacts.html and a "press area":http://www.ilovepasta.org/news.html with interesting pasta news. Some interesting pasta facts to whet your palate: * _Legend has it that noodles were first made by 13th century German bakers who fashioned dough into symbolic shapes, such as swords, birds and stars, which were baked and served as bread.In the 13th century, the Pope set quality standards for pasta._ * _To cook one billion pounds of pasta, you would need 2,021,452,000 gallons of water - enough to fill nearly 75,000 Olympic-size swimming pools._ * _Approximately 2.75 million tons of pasta is made in Italy each year, while the United States produces nearly 1.9 million tons per year._ * _There are more than 600 pasta shapes produced worldwide._

Climate Change as a Weapon

What are the lengths nations might be willing to go to in order to secure supremacy? This is a question we as a species have asked throughout our history and it seems as if the answer has changed over the millenia. Back before it was a realistic possibility to do so, military rhetoric used to be full of the idea of blowing an enemy off the face of the earth, but what if we could simply change the earth we’re facing? That is the question asked in “Jamais Cascio”:http://www.openthefuture.com/jamais_bio.html’s article in the January 2008 issue of “Foreign Policy”:http://www.foreignpolicy.com, “Battlefield Earth”:http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=414.
Building on a theme from his personal site, “OpentheFuture.com”:http://www.openthefuture.com, Cascio discusses the possibilities of geo-engineering as a strategic weapon. As climate science has proven, human actions have changed the way our Earth works in terms of raising overall atmospheric temperature but what if we could change things on purpose?
By manipulating our environment enough, the Saudis could in theory bring rain to Arabia and avoid the inevitable shortage of drinking water in that region. The Chinese could bring drought to Taiwan and force it’s high-value high-tech industry into mainland China’s eager arms. It sounds like a REALLY bad idea right? But that doesn’t mean someone won’t try it. In fact, Cascio rightly points out that our own US Government has tried it, first during Vietnam with Project Popeye–an effort to seed more rain clouds and strengthen the monsoons hitting the Ho Chi Minh trail–and then in the mid-90’s with the Air Force policy paper: “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.” I don’t know if this is an accurate predictor of the future, but I know it’s a future I don’t want to see.
More about articles about “global warming”:http://duenos.net/article/global-warming on Duenos.net.

Books to Read: Warped Passages

My sister was reading “Vogue”:http://www.style.com/vogue/ the other day and happened upon an article about Professor “Lisa Randall”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Randall. Not only is she a triple tenured professor at “Princeton”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princeton_University, “MIT”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT, and “Harvard”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard, a leading expert on “particle physics”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics, “string theory”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory, and “cosmology”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology, in “Time’s 100 Scientists and Thinkers”:http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/time100/article/0,28804,1595326_1595329_1615997,00.html for 2007, and author of “Warped Passages”:http://www.amazon.com/Warped-Passages-Unraveling-Mysteries-Dimensions/dp/0060531096/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1199318101&sr=8-1, she’s pretty good lookin’, too. I’ve been particularly interested in higher dimensions for quite a while. In addition to Warped Passages, which I just started, I suggest reading “The Fourth Dimension”:http://www.amazon.com/4th-Dimension-Toward-Geometry-Reality/dp/0395344204/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1199318341&sr=8-21, which is another great read.

Visualizing Storybooks

_Picture books are for looking at._ That’s the rather simple motto of my favorite book site of the moment, “Lookybook.com”:http://www.lookybook.com/. Through this site you can browse and buy hundreds of picture books, save them to a virtual bookshelf for later reading, and recommend picture books through the community. Another fabulous implementation of the promise of web 2.0. Embedded below is “Lemons are Not Red” by Laura Vaccaro Seeger.

Previously featured on Duenos:
* “No Red Carpet for Most Recent Newberry Winner”:http://duenos.net/article/54/no-red-carpet-for-most-recent-newberry-winner: A scandalous word lands a children’s author in hot water.

Physics guru from MIT

As far as professors go, there is no one like Walter Lewin. At a university like MIT, where I’m sure there are lots of professors who try to dodge introductory courses–preferring to leave that sort of work to graduate students or junior lecturers–Lewin has perfected the art of teaching. His lectures on basic concepts like “classical mechanics”:http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/CourseHome/, “electricity and magnetism”:http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-02Electricity-and-MagnetismSpring2002/CourseHome/, or “vibrations and waves”:http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-03Fall-2004/CourseHome/ are works of genius combining scientific information with a humble yet often fantastic stage presence the likes of which very few actors ever achieve. Preferring to show rather than tell, Dr. Lewin’s lectures feature real examples of physics at work, like this pictured demonstration of the conservation of momentum.
Perhaps the best part about Lewin’s lectures–at least as far as I’m concerned–is that they are not just available to students at MIT. Thanks to a great educational outreach program called “MIT Open Courseware”:http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/home/home/index.htm, Lewin’s lectures and many others are available for anyone to download and watch. Alternatively, “iTunesU”:http://www.apple.com/education/itunesu/, a special educational sub-section of Apple’s iTunes music store distributes all of Lewin’s physics lectures, as well as TONS of other materials from all over the world.
For more information about Lewin and his work, read his “faculty bio”:http://web.mit.edu/physics/facultyandstaff/faculty/walter_lewin.html from the MIT website, “this article”:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/education/19physics.html?_r=1&ex=1198904400&en=422fff9addc1eaff&ei=5070&emc=eta1&oref=slogin from the “New York Times”:http://www.nytimes.com, or his entry in the ever-informative information hive that is “Wikipedia”:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Lewin.
(Thanks Melissa)

Help Cool the Globe

Long ago, duenos.net introduced Colin Beavan, the “no impact man”:http://duenos.net/article/137/ColinBeavanthenoimpactman. As easily as we can cheer him and others like him on, we can also take action in our own way. It’s OK to complain about the state of global warming and pollution in our environment, but it is even better to act.
Look on “Stopglobalwarming.org”:http://www.stopglobalwarming.org/sgw_actionitems.asp (the posters below are theirs), “Sierraclub.org”:http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarming/tenthings/, and “Climatecrisis.net”:http://www.climatecrisis.net/takeaction/whatyoucando/ to find simple and effective ways to clean up our earth. Committing to some of these actions will not only reduce pollution, but your spending and waistline, too. It’s a win-win-win.
Previously featured on Duenos.net:
* “Colin Beavan, the no impact man”:http://duenos.net/article/137/ColinBeavanthenoimpactman, featuring a great interview with Stephen Colbert.
* “Permafrost no longer”:http://duenos.net/article/286/Permafrostnolonger, about the decline in frostiness of Arctic tundra.
* “Betting on global warming”:http://duenos.net/article/159/Bettingonglobalwarming, about a bookie who takes bets on climate change science.
This entry was posted in Original Duenos and tagged , on by .

From Toilet to Tap

I wanted to highlight “this article”:http://www.slate.com/id/2182758?GT1=10837, which talks about Orange County’s Jan 25 ’08 unveiling of their poop processing plant that converts CA residents’ turds to potable water. This is the first of its kind (in the US), given that previous attempts had been stomped by what I like to call the “yuck factor.” It’s cheaper, greener, and, I must admit, grosser than traditional reclamation methods, but maybe worth the sacrifice given the problems CA faces when getting drinkable water to its citizens.

Green film studio in Toronto

The movie industry is inherently wasteful. Their job is to recreate something in every small detail, shoot it, and then throw it away. High production value depends on props being new, recreations being authentic, and materials being cheap–but not cheap looking. From the disposable food containers used on set to the costumes on the actors’ backs, film is simply wasteful. That’s why I got really excited when I heard about “Filmport”:http://www.filmport.ca/, a new ecologically-sound megastudio under construction in Toronto.
http://www.thestar.com/article/287989") Of course, big ideas are never without critics and Filmport studio complex is no exception. The "main complaints":http://www.readingt.readingcities.com/index.php/toronto/comments/12115/ seem to be about the nature of the architecture and the financial feasibility of the project as a whole. As far as the economics are concerned I couldn't say, but the main building itself... Well, see for yourself: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/12/new_film_studio.php" for the catch.